|
Victorian
or Amazon?
The Russian
Woman Under
the First
Five-Year Plan
Abbye Needham
(* The original paper
included photos, which regretably were not reprintable.--
Editors)
The Soviet Union underwent many changes beginning
in 1928 with the adoption of Stalin’s First
Five-Year Plan. The goal of this plan was to industrialize
the motherland in a short amount of time. Drastic
measures were taken to fulfill the plan’s
goal, and the result was an industrialized Russia
in only a few years. The First and Second Five-Year
Plans affected all aspects of the Soviet Union. Not
only did it affect the economy and agriculture, but
it also brought drastic changes to social life. A sector
of society, which by no means escaped the effects
of Stalin’s economic plans, was the Russian
woman. The everyday Russian woman was faced with
her own dilemma: how to balance becoming a worker
with keeping her femininity.
It must first be established exactly what the
First and Second Five Year Plans were intended
to do. Both economic plans were established in
order to industrialize the Soviet Union in a timely
fashion. In fact, the industrialization was so
fast-paced that extreme goals were set for the
country to reach. The First Five-Year Plan called for
the quick building of factories, collective farms and
the like to aid in the rapid pace of industrialization.
The First Five-Year Plan also brought with it
several limitations and restrictions. It was hard
to gain access to Western goods, for special permits
were required to purchase such imported items.
In addition, those embracing any type of Western
"luxury" were viewed as traitors to Stalin’s
Communist ideal. Compounded with this restriction
on purchases was the fact that living conditions
were terrible: living space was cramped and cold
at best, food was scarce and workers often worked
consecutive shifts.
However, by the end of the First Five-Year Plan
and the installation of the Second, conditions
began to improve. The Soviet Union had made a
firm foundation for industrialization, so restrictions
were lifted to an extent. Starting in the early
1930s, it was easier for Soviets to gain access
to Western goods: "the reign of the [First] Five
Year Plan has loosened and the people are thinking earnestly
about luxuries.1" At the same time, living
conditions as well as the economy were improving,
thus aiding in the diminishing of the restrictions.
As described in John Scott’s book Behind
the Urals, the realization of industry marked
an improvement in the conditions of workers and
a broadening of the freedoms offered. Scott’s
description of a factory town, Sverdlovsk, illustrates
this point extremely well:
The city was surrounded by villages
and farms which furnished vegetables and
dairy products . . . There were theatres,
and even ballet performances . . . Most
families lived in houses or apartments,
while many of the people of Magnitogorsk
lived in either tents or barracks.2
In the book, Sverdlovsk is an established industrial
town. As might be expected, the overall conditions
there are much better than Scott’s own city,
one still struggling with the task of building
factories.
For the Soviet women, the Five-Year Plans allowed
them freedoms that they had never been offered.
The economic programs offered women a chance to
enter the workforce and thus experience a small
amount of equality with their male counterparts.
The Soviet women under these plans, however, did not
participate solely to gain equality, but rather viewed
their labor as a chance to aid in the formation of a
Soviet state. Since Stalin’s emphasis was
on industrialization, "Russia’s main need
is for workers, it follows that when she comes
to look at her women it is as workers.3"
Soviet women were working to advance the great industrial
program of which they felt a part.’’ Though
one might argue that the women had reason to resent
the restrictions of the Plans, this supposition
can quickly be put to rest. In the early years
of the Five-Year Plan, Western luxuries were viewed
as essentially "evil" by all Soviets, even women.
The women would rather dress as men than wear
the latest fashions and risk being considered
traitors.5 In addition, the Soviet women
were dedicated to the establishment of an industrial
state. Decidedly patriotic, these women desired to aid
in the formation of an industrialized Soviet state.
In fact, their role became that of industrial
workers who would in time build a great nation.
As can be seen in the pictures in Appendix A,
the women are proud to be a part of the Soviet
workforce. They come home wearing huge smiles,
their steps are confident and they seem to revel
in their freedom to work in the same jobs as their
male coworkers, the measure of equality that women
in other countries during this era were still fighting
for. The Soviet women saw their equality in the fact
that they had the right to share all professions and
opportunities as men.6 During the economic
programs women were allowed to participate in
all fields of work. Women became factory workers,
coal miners, and even donned the uniforms of the
army, navy and airforce. Women also made an appearance
in the professional fields such as medicine and
law. Basically there was no field that women did
not or could not enter, and they did it all for
the benefit of the "mother land."
Several pictures depict Soviet women at work and
returning from work with smiles. They loved their
work and the freedom that came with it. No longer
was woman’s place only in the home, but
now she could enter any walk of life without a
qualm. Now, she could actually be viewed as a human,
something she was not seen as during the czarist years,
which boasted proverbs such as "a chicken is not
a bird and a woman is not a human being.7"
Stalin’s Five Year Plan gave women the chance
to become an integral part of the economy. With
this came a number of privileges. She could work
alongside men, participate in politics and even
hope to achieve full equality on a collective
farm.8
Despite the fact that the Soviet woman’s
focus was on work, she never forgot her femininity.
The new privileges and responsibilities did not
stop the Soviet women from desiring certain female
commodities. In fact, her desires for beauty and
fashion throve despite her manly labor and characteristics.
A new mental cast is developing
in Russia and a new woman is the product
of this period of evolution. She is characterized
not so much by beauty as by sturdiness,
self-reliance. Yet her femininity is asserting
itself more and more.9
Time and time again a rough looking woman in shabby
clothes with the hard features of a man could
be seen staring at exquisite Western fashions
displayed in decorated window fronts (Appendix
B). The young Soviet female worker still desired
to be beautiful, despite her status as an industrial
worker. The Soviet woman might see her purpose in the
economy, "yet, the factory girl in Moscow is just
as eager to adorn herself and to enhance her attractiveness
as is the lady of Park Avenue.10" The
Soviet woman became a worker, but she did not
forget her femininity. Although in the early years
of the Five Year Plan the Soviet women could be
seen dressed in men’s clothing and nearly
indistinguishable from male workers, the last
days of this Plan presented women desiring to personify
their female counterparts in the West. Daily the Soviet
women displayed the typical Victorian attitude, "it
is not that the Russia tovarisch is more amazon
than feminine. Love of children and of a family
are strong in Russia.11" She might
have become an important member of the workforce,
but at night she returned home to her husband
and sometimes children. The Soviet woman also
sought to improve herself physically as well as
mentally. If she could ever get her hands on a Western
fashion magazine, she would pore over the pages hungrily
to simply look at the illustrations.12 Her
desires for fine clothes, perfumes and even a
family prove the fact that Soviet women desire
to keep their femininity while they participate
in the formation of an industrialized "motherland."
During the later part of the First Five-Year Plan
the Stalin government allowed women more freedoms.
Not only were they allowed to enter the workforce,
but also were allowed to divorce, marry and raise
children with the state’s help. Despite
the freedoms offered by the government, however, "Russian
women still struggle for rights which Soviet law gives
them, but which old-fashioned husbands and backward
officials seek to ignore.13" Since
the government called for women to enter the workforce,
and since the women responded eagerly for the
chance at participating in the building of a great
nation, the freedoms and equality which came with
their decisions were not significantly seen by
the Soviet women.
The Russian woman
does not look on her job as an escape
from domesticity or as an attempt to assert
herself in a work of men. She is never
conscious of a conflict between her career
and her personal life.14
For the Soviet women the chance at being viewed
as equal with their male counterparts was just
an added bonus to the fact that the women had
an opportunity to industrialize mother Russia.
So even when certain that the economic measures
such as the piecework system (the system by which a
worker was paid for the amount of goods he/she produced)
created setbacks in women’s equality, the women
of the Five Year Plan focused on the larger picture,
the industrialization of the Soviet Union. Though
they earned less than men "they can do almost
any kind of work they want to" for the benefit
of their country.15
So what were the Soviet women of the 1920s and
30s, Victorians or Amazons? The answer to this
question is that they adopted characteristics
of each. The Soviet women might have donned the
clothes of workers, but they never truly became
Amazons (women who exemplify independence, freedom
and equality through their lives.) Instead, the Soviet
women with their affinity for female commodities (i.e.
fashion, perfume, makeup) were able to keep their
femininity. The women who lived under the First
Five-Year Plan became workers; their primary focus
was industry, for after work the women went home
and were the typical Victorian women. The simple
fact was that "life is so intense and expansive
[during the Five Year Plan] that they [children,
domestic qualities] represent but a fraction of
the interests of the Soviet women.16" The Russian
women became Soviet workers and invaded every field
of industry, but at the same time they still wanted
to look and act like traditional women. The dilemma
these women faced was never truly reconciled.
Instead, the Soviet woman found a way to balance
both her patriotic desire to aid in the industrialization
of the Soviet Union with her desires for Western
fashions and commodities. She became a type of
Amazon, in that she was able to keep both of her
desires and gain certain headway for equality,
freedom and greater opportunities for the future.
Endnotes
1. Margaret Bourke-White,
"Silk Stockings in the Five-Year Plan," New
York Times 14 Feb. 1932: VI 4.
2. John Scott, Behind
the Urals: An American Worker in Russia’s
City of Steel (Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1973)
104.
3. Ellen Wilkinson, "A Feminist
Looks at Woman’s Status," New York Times
16 Dec. 1934: X 5.
4. Margaret Bourke-White,
VI 4.
5. Ibid.
6. Milly Bennett, "Soviet
Russia Discovers ‘Home, Sweet Home’:
The New Place of Women in the State Reflected
in Stricter Social Laws," New York Times 10
Nov 1935: VII 12.
7. Samuel Lubell, "Three
Nations in Flux are reflected in Their Women,"
New York Times 21 Oct.
1934: VI 10.
8. Ibid.
9. Margaret Bourke-White,
VI 4.
10. Ibid.
11. Samuel Lubell, VI 4.
12. Margaret Bourke-White,
VI 5.
13. Special Cable, "Soviet
Girl Dies by Fire To Escape Cruel Husband,"
New York Times 15 Oct. 1935: 13:3
14. Margaret Bourke-White,
VI 4.
15. Special Correspondence,
"Russian Women Take Readily To Men’s Jobs,"
New York Times 27 Nov 1932:
II 4.
16. Samuel Lubell, VI 4.
Works Cited
Bennett, Milly. "Soviet Russia Discovers ‘Home,
Sweet Home’: The New Place of Women
in the State Reflected in Stricter Social
Laws." New York Times 10 Nov. 1935:
VII 12-13.
Bourke-White, Margaret. "Silk Stockings in
the Five-Year Plan." New York Times
14 Feb. 1932: VI 4-5.
Lubell, Samuel. "Three Nations in Flux Are
Reflected In Their Women." New York Times
21 Oct. 1934: VI 10-11.
Wilkinson, Ellen. "A Feminist Looks as Woman’s
Status." NewYork Times 16 Dec. 1934:
X 4-5.
Scott, John. Behind the Urals: An American
Worker in Russia’s City of Steel
. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1973. 104.
Special Cable. "Soviet Girl Dies by Fire to
Escape Cruel Husband." New York Times
15 Oct 1935: 13.
Special Correspondence. "Russian Women Take Readily
to Men’s Jobs." New York Times 27
Nov. 1932: II 4.
|