Free Fall with air resistance near earth's surface
Approximations: NEAR earth's surface means we will use Fgravity = -mg where g = constant; also we will assume that the air density is constant and assume that the air resistance coefficient is indeed a constant.
Case 1: FAR = - bv
SF = ma leads to -mg - bv = m dv/dt , or
dt = dv / [-g - (b/m)v] = -(m/b) dv / [v + mg/b]
Let w = v + mg/b so that dw = dv, and remember to adjust the limits of integration:
t = -(m/b) wo=vo+mg/bò w = v+mg/b dw/w = -(m/b) ln[(v+mg/b) /
(vo+mg/b)]
e-bt/m = (v+mg/b) / (vo+mg/b)
(v+mg/b) = (vo+mg/b) e-bt/m
v(t) = vo e-bt/m - (mg/b)(1- e-bt/m)
Check units:
1) (mg/b) should have units of velocity.
2) (b/m) should have units of inverse time.
Limiting cases:
1) as t goes to zero, v goes to vo as it should.
2) as t gets large, v goes to a terminal speed = -mg/b.
3) Behavior as m changes: The bigger the m, the bigger the terminal speed and the longer it takes to reach that higher terminal speed.
4) Behavior as b changes: The bigger the b, the smaller the terminal speed; but it is unclear what happens for small time with small b since b is in the denominator of the coefficient! We can find out by expanding e-bt/m in a power series to get:
v(small t) = - (mg/b)(1 - [1 - bt/m + (1/2)b2t2/m2 - (1/6)(b3t3/m3) + ...]
v(small t) = -gt + (1/2)bgt2/m - (1/6)b2gt3/m2
+ ...
Thus, as b goes to zero, the speed becomes that of free fall without air resistance (v = -gt) like it should.
Method of Successive Approximation Technique
To put in effects that are smaller (such as air resistance compared to gravity), we can use a method called the method of successive approximations. In this method, we first solve the problem without any of the smaller effects: (we will use vo=0 to make the math easier)
Zero order:
F = -mg so -mg = m dv/dt which gives: dv = -g dt or v(0)(t) = vo - gt = -gt .
First order:
F = -mg - bv(0) so -mg -b[-gt] = m dv/dt which gives: dv = {-g -(b/m)[-gt]}dt
or: v(1)(t) = - gt + (1/2)bgt2/m.
Second order:
F = -mg - bv(1) so -mg -b[-gt + (1/2)bgt2/m] = m dv/dt which gives:
dv = {-g -b/m[-gt + (1/2)bgt2/m]} dt
or: v(2)(t) = -gt + (1/2)bgt2/m
- (1/6)b2gt3/m2
Note that this gives the same result as the series expansion of our analytical result!
-------------------------------------
Case 2: FAR = - bv2 (let’s consider the case going downward, and choose down as the positive direction)
SF = ma leads to mg – bv2 = m dv/dt , or
dt = dv / [g - (b/m)v2] = (1/g) dv / [1 – (b/mg)v2]
Let (b/mg)1/2v = sin(j) so that dv = (mg/b)1/2cos(j)dj , and remember to adjust the limits of integration: j = sin-1[(b/mg)1/2v]
t = (1/g) joò
j
(mg/b)1/2cos(j)dj / [1 – sin2(j)] = (1/g) joò j
(mg/b)1/2cos(j)dj / cos2(j) = (1/g) joò j
(mg/b)1/2 dj / cos(j)
from a table of integrals, we have ò dj / cos(j) = ln [(1/cos(j) + tan(j)] so
t = (m/gb)1/2 { ln [(1/cos(j) + tan(j)] - ln [(1/cos(jo) + tan(jo)] }
= (m/gb)1/2 { ln
[{(1/cos(j)
+ tan(j)]}
/ {(1/cos(jo)
+ tan(jo)}]
}
where j = sin-1[(b/mg)1/2v] and jo = sin-1[(b/mg)1/2vo] .
Check units:
1) (m/gb)1/2 should have units of time: m has units of kg; g has units of m/s2, b has units of Nt/(m/s)2 = (kg*m/s2)/(m2/s2) = kg/m; therefore (m/gb)1/2 has units of [kg/{(m/s2)*(kg/m)}]1/2 = s.
2) (b/mg)1/2 should have units of inverse velocity: {(kg/m)/[kg*m/s2]}1/2 = s/m.
Limiting cases:
1) as v goes to vo, t should go to zero, and it does.
2) the terminal speed is when bv2 = mg which gives vt = (mg/b)1/2. As v approaches vt, we would expect t to approach infinity. Since j = sin-1[(b/mg)1/2v] and (b/mg)1/2 = 1/vt , as v approaches vt, j approaches p/2. Now as j approaches p/2, 1/cos(j) approached infinity and tan(j) approaches infinity, and the ln[value approaches infinity] approaches infinity, the time approaches infinity as v approaches vt as we would expect.
Homework Problem: Problem #10.
Use the method of successive approximation to find the first order
expression for v(t) for the above Case 2.
Alternate solution for case 2:
SF = ma leads to mg – bv2 = m dv/dt , or
dt = dv / [g - (b/m)v2] = (1/g) dv / [1 – (b/mg)v2]
Let (b/mg)1/2v = u so that dv = (mg/b)1/2du , and remember to adjust the limits of integration.
t = (1/g) uoò
u (mg/b)1/2du / [1 – u2] .
Now 1/(1-u2) = A/(1-u) + B/(1+u) = {A(1+u) + B(1-u)}/(1-u2)
so that A+B = 1 and
A-B = 0 which has the solution of A = ½ = B; so 1/(1-u2) = ½
{1/(1+u)} + ½ {1/(1-u)}, so ò du/(1-u2) = ½ ò du/(1+u) + ½ ò du/(1-u) ; now let y
= 1-u and z = 1+u so that
ò du/(1-u2) = ½ ò dz/z + ½ ò -dy/y = ½ {ln(z) – ln(zo)} - ½ {ln(y) –
ln(yo)}
but since zo = 1+uo = 1+0 = 0, and yo = 1-uo
= 1, and ln(1) = 0, we have
ò du/(1-u2) = ½ { ln(1+u) – ln(1-u) } = ½ ln{(1+u)/(1-u)}
=
½ ln[ {1+(b/mg)1/2v} / {1-(b/mg)1/2v} ], so that
t = ½ (m/gb)1/2 ln[ {1+(b/mg)1/2v} / {1-(b/mg)1/2v}
].
Although the two expressions for t,
t = (m/gb)1/2 { ln [{(1/cos(j) + tan(j)]} /
{(1/cos(jo)
+ tan(jo)}]
}
where j = sin-1[(b/mg)1/2v] and jo = sin-1[(b/mg)1/2vo] .
and t = ½ (m/gb)1/2
ln[ {1+(b/mg)1/2v} / {1-(b/mg)1/2v} ]
look quite different, they are in fact equivalent.
The second form we can convert from t(v) into v(t):
2t(gb/m)1/2 = ln[ {1+(b/mg)1/2v} / {1-(b/mg)1/2v}
]
now let a = (gb/m)1/2 and we get:
e2at = {1+(b/mg)1/2v} / {1-(b/mg)1/2v} , or
e2at {1-(b/mg)1/2v} = {1+(b/mg)1/2v} , or putting all v’s on one side:
(b/mg)1/2v (e2at + 1) = (e2at - 1) , or
v(t) = (mg/b)1/2 (e2at - 1) / (e2at + 1) , or multiplying numerator and denominator by e-at
v(t) = (mg/b)1/2 (eat – e-at) / (eat + e-at) , and since tanh(x) = (ex – e-x) / (ex + e-x), we have:
v(t) = (mg/b)1/2 tanh[(gb/m)1/2 t] = vt tanh[(gb/m)1/2 t] since (mg/b)1/2 = vt .